The day as standard unit of time for events

Why is the day the standard unit of time for so many workshops, trainings and conferences. I think it’s worth questioning.

I often find on training that you can have a really engaging morning, but the afternoon turns out to be exhausting. We got on a roll but then pushed too far. I quite like doing smaller, half-day chunks with space between for reflection. Maybe even shorter chunks.

At the other end, events are often transformed by being overnight. Everyone immediately worries about the costs of accommodation – but I feel there are huge rewards for having a group recreate together, sleep reflect and re-examine stuff in the morning.

Bonus link: Roland’s sparky post about boring conferences.

2 thoughts on “The day as standard unit of time for events

  1. Chris Corrigan

    I once went to a 18 person conference in Tucson with a number of academics. We had a two hour conversation in the morning from 10-12 and then a two hour conversation in the afternoon from 330-530 followed by some drinks and dinner and hanging out. It was the best run conference I’ve every participated in. Learned a lot and, even 8 years later, remember it well.

    Reply
  2. Ron Rosenhead

    Great article thanks. It coincides with a Blog written this week called Project Management Training: Classroom vs mobile (http://bit.ly/XLbORW)

    Your article seems to say yes, face to face however not simply 1 day but a day +; the plus could be one to one coaching, webinars, reading, homework, plus a process of bringing all of the learning back into the workplace such as another very short and directed workshop.

    Good post and thanks

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>