Johnnie Moore

Why I won’t be rushing to attend KM conferences

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

This is a rant. I don’t rant much on the blog these days as I’d rather be doing stuff I like than railing against things I don’t. But once in a while the provocation gets the better of me.

When I read David Gurteen’s post, What is a Conversational Conference, I thought David was doing a good job of seeing the glass as half full. He quoted this blurb from KM Australia 2013:

What is a conversational event?

This congress will follow an interactive conversational format. Each speaker will present a case study for 25 minutes and conclude their presentation with a question to the audience.

The remaining 15-20 minutes of each session will be given to the audience to discuss the speakers talk and the question at their tables before going into a traditional Q&A.

This conversational format is intended to create an informal, relaxed atmosphere in which you, the conference participants, can get to know each other, learn from each other and build relationships.

Where to begin?

So basically they tweak the tired, standard conference format and insert a few minutes of highly controlled conversation. How much power does this give participants? No much. They are expected to answer a question set by the speaker; they must answer it with the people they are sitting next to. Not much freedom offered there. And then we hurry back to the weary old Q and A format.

I don’t know, but I wonder if they’re also going to sit people at those awful 8-person tables, where you can barely hear those sitting opposite you, but feel constrained to pretend that you can. Tables that so fill the room you are actively discouraged from moving around and deciding who to mix with? I wonder if the room will be semi-dark and gloomy, all the for benefit of some probably dead ugly slides that have print too small to read?

And this is the cutting edge of Knowledge Management? These are the folks who are supposed to be exploring the exciting frontiers of possibility? The ones who are here to revolutionise how organisations learn and relate?

This is their idea of a good time?

I’d rather watch paint dry.

Have any of these knowledge managers noticed this thing called the internet and the rise of peer-to-peer networks? Have they reflected that if you want to absorb a chunk of content, you can watch a youtube presentation at your own pace in your own time, so that when you actually meet people in the flesh you can actually talk?

Come to that, have they actually been to a coffee shop? Where they don’t have enormous tables and generally have daylight? And where people have loud animated conversations, amazingly without someone handing them a little card explaining (well, stipulating) what a conversation is, and what it would be wise for them to talk about, and who they should be talking about it with?

Dave Snowden tackles the same subject and offers an alternative approach. It’s not entirely my cup of tea but it’s an imaginative attempt to offer something different. I’d want to suggest something a bit more radical but that’s for another post.

Share Post

More Posts

Sunny Delight

Sunny Delight plumbs new depths of hypocrisy in its advertising. This is the action of a lustmark, not a lovemark…

The language of branding

I’m feeling more and more uneasy about the language of marketing/branding. I’ve felt this unease for a long time, but I’m finding it harder and harder to ignore or even tolerate.

The futility of Q and A

I’m not saying it’s always a bad idea. But it usually is. I mean the conventional thing we seem to do after listening to presentations:

I really hate panel sessions

I hardly ever go to meetings that promise a panel format. I was recently reminded why. It seems to me that as humans we are

Trances and idols

Euan writes about organisations apparently embracing a slow and willing death. Realising that we are in a trance and breaking out of it, might be

Government reports

I have a longstanding beef about what I call celebrity government reports. The MO is this: some contentious issue arises in society. The government responds

Change myths

This HBR post attempts to evaluate Obama’s record on change management based on a four step model. I’m instinctively wary of models and this one

Behaviour change, revisited

Please don’t take this too literally, I just need to get this off my chest. A while back, Mark posted some good provocative challenges to

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Facilitation as a leadership style

Steve Davis (in his regular newsletter) has been thinking about Facilitation as a leadership style and brings up a table created by Richard Weaver & John Farrell in their book

Johnnie Moore

Podcast: Agility

In this podcast I talk with Rob Paterson and Neil Perkin about agility in organisations. This was sparked by Neil’s post about agile planning – ways for organisations to respond

Johnnie Moore

Alan Watts on language

Jeff Risley recommends the podcasts of Alan Watts. So do I. I’ve just listened to the first of four on the theme “Limits of Language”. I think we easily lose

Johnnie Moore

Mush?

I’ve just stumbled across Jaron Lanier’s op ed from the WSJ: World Wide Mush. It’s like a trailer for his new book You are not a gadget. I found his