Obviously this is too simplistic.
But I have this question for anyone who’s got some process to manage human beings in organisations. You know the sort of thing… a process to set and manage coaching; a format for efficient meetings; a form for 360 feedback, an assessment “tool” for interviews.
Does this process bear any resemblance to how you actually relate, in your own life, to anyone whom you love? (eg how you chose your spouse, how you treat your children etc etc)
And if not, why not?
finding a more human way of connecting in the networks we belong to
Embracing uncertainty and avoiding simplistic solutions
What’s going on when we use language?
There’s more potential in each moment than we realise
there’s more to meeting fear than our thoughts
getting out of the rut in familiar relationships
learning from experience, not theory
noticing the effect our stories have on us as tellers
Being careful where we invest our imagination
why being patient with confusion might be a better way to teach
How’s this for an ad agency? Huh? huh? is an enclave of new-age e-movers. We use catchy names for our job titles, like Vision Guidance Leader instead of Project Manager.
Once again, it turns out that what we do naturally has more value than we realise; whereas clever contrivances intended to “improve” our effectiveness often just destroy significance… and make us less well understood! A good lesson for all those presentation trainers and “image consultants” out there!
Dave Pollard is one of the unique voices I’d never have heard but for the internet. He writes with tremendous passion intensity and bluntness. I remember him saying he was
Shawn Callahan points to Edeleman and Intelliseek’s paper on Corporate Blogging which does a pretty good job of making the case to corporates.
I help teams work together better. My work ranges from leadership development to team building and event facilitation
© 2024 Johnnie Moore | Privacy | Hosted by Wingnut
