Bzz controversy

There’s been a storm of comments about BzzAgent’s deal to promote Creative Commons. Peter Caputa has written something that just about captures my own view: essentially that criticism of BzzAgent is often overdone and a bit self-righteous. And that Dave Balter went a bit OTT in response (credit to him for subsequently apologising).

I’ve been self-righteous myself from time-to-time, it can be very satisfying in the short run to be so damn smart and so damn right. I know the pleasure of nailing up a forensic list of the 12 fatal flaws in other side’s position. This is the joy of advocacy over enquiry. But in the end, I find respectful dialogue is more sustainable. (Learning instead of problem-solving).

Peter also picks up this great insight from Kevin at Corante’s Many to Many:

I think this is because BzzAgents crosses the line between the two moral syndromes that Jane Jacobs identifies in Systems of Survival – the Guardian syndrome, which is based on loyalty and social groups, and the Commercial one, which is based on honest dealing and collaboration with strangers.

2 thoughts on “Bzz controversy

  1. Crossroads Dispatches

    BzzAgents…Creative Commons…Common Ground?

    It’s rather sad that the Creative Commons loyalists and word-of-mouth marketing company BzzAgents can’t see any common ground. Both are attempts at changing established rules of play. It’s rather sad that a conversation isn’t happening. If blogs are a …

    Reply
  2. pc4media

    BzzAgent Doesn’t Handle Negative Buzz Very Well

    I was quick to defend BzzAgent when Suw Charman criticized them recently: More whining about bzzagent. (Even when they are doing good things like supporting Creative Commons.) I really think that people need to see bzzagent as just another way

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.