Johnnie Moore

Changing mental models

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

Evelyn Rodriguez reflects on Flexing Mental Muscles. Perhaps the nub is two paragraphs quoted from The Power of Impossible Thinking.

“The first kind of learning, which is far more common and more easily achieved, is to deepen our knowledge within an existing mental model or discipline.”

“The second kind of learning is focused on new mental models and shifting from one to another. It does not deepen knowledge in a specific model but rather looks at the world outside the model and adopts or develops new models to make sense of this broader world…Learning about new mental models is much more challenging and complex, but crucial in an environment of rapid change and uncertainty.”

This makes a great deal of sense to me, and I realise it’s so easy to get stuck in a mental model without noticing that you’re stuck. Just watch any political debate – or pub argument – and mostly you will see rigid mental models bouncing off each other.

David Bohm’s Dialogue proposal contains some deep thinking about ways to become aware of the mental models themselves. Here’s the key passage

To further clarify this approach, we propose that, with the aid of a little close attention, even that which we call rational thinking can be see to consist largely of responses conditioned and biased by previous thought. If we look carefully at what we generally take to be reality we begin to see that it includes a collection of concepts, memories and reflexes colored by our personal needs, fears, and desires, all of which are limited and distorted by the boundaries of language and the habits of our history, sex and culture. It is extremely difficult to disassemble this mixture or to ever be certain whether what we are perceiving – or what we may think about those perceptions – is at all accurate.

I’ve been thinking about collective intelligence and the idea of “group mind” – the sort of thing that many of us experience, albeit fleetingly, in teams and groups, when we sense a level of connection beyond the norm. Traditional models of group thinking seem based on me trying to cement my well-formed brick of thought to your well-formed brick. Increasingly, I find much more satisfaction in sharing the less-formed ideas and responses I have to conversations. I sense that by doing so, it’s possible to create some sense of joint intelligence that can get beyond existing mental models.

I suppose that my blogging process tends towards bricks, as I write down ideas and get to tweak and edit them and improve them, to make them more palatable to the outside world.

A bit like Evelyn, I’m not sure that I can really explain this in a blog, but hey, I tried. Of course, if you’d like to Skype me we could explore it together…

Share Post

More Posts

Fluke

There’s more potential in each moment than we realise

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Do group blogs suck?

Robert Scoble reckons that Group Blogs Suck. It’s a good thought including this point: The thing is my visitors are coming to see me. Me alone. If I am interesting

Johnnie Moore

Another view…

Andrew Sullivan has a series of posts based on his readers’ varying perspectives on the recession. This one resonated for me. Here’s a snippet: Though I am still worried about

Johnnie Moore

Work and university

Rob Paterson writes I want to go back to the best of work and to the best of university. Sounds like a plan.

Johnnie Moore

City branding

Katherine Stone is underwhelmed by Atlanta’s new tagline (Atlanta: Every day is opening day). Christina Maynard at Ricksticks feels the same about the new logos for Toronto and Atlanta. I’m