Johnnie Moore

Driving Identity

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I’ve been having a few conversations recently with Adriana. She’s been doing a lot of heavy conceptual thinking about where the web is taking us. It’s hard to keep up sometimes but it feels pretty important. This post is probably not an accurate guide to her ideas more an effort on my part to make my own sense of them.

Some of her most interesting thinking is on the subject of identity, where she argues, very provocatively, that our notions are rooted in an old, hierarchical mindset. To the point where we haven’t noticed the assumptions we’ve been making.

To set the context for this, it’s worth looking at her post celebrating the work of Whit Diffie in inventing public-key cryptography. Adriana sums up his breakthrough idea

The issue of privacy, boiled down for Whit Diffie to: How do you deal with a trustworthy person in the midst of a world full of untrustworthy people?

Diffie also believed in what he called “a decentralised view of authority”. By creating the proper cryptographic tools, he felt, you could solve the problem – by transferring the data protection from a disinterested third party to the actual user, the one whose privacy was actually at risk.

So instead of relying on a central authority to protect our data, we can do it peer-to-peer – a manner much more aligned with our innate human instincts.

So let’s stretch that idea to how we establish our identity online. We tend to default to third-party endorsement: driving licence, credit card, passport etc. Adriana argues that this is a very hierarchical approach, whereas the internet is designed as a heterarchy. In a heterarchy, strength comes from diversity, so ideally we don’t want to rely on cumbersome – and often flawed – central bureaucracies.

Over coffee, Adriana talked about us being able to drive our own identity, a phrase which resonates strongly with me. Most existing web spaces force us to squeeze our identity into someone else’s boxes, using up our time filling and refilling standard questions and conforming to someone else’s crude categories. (Think about what the idea of “friend” means in a Facebook world).

What if we didn’t have to do that? That’s such a big leap of imagination that it makes my brain hurt. But it could be the same kind of breakthrough that we saw in cryptography, writ large.

If you’re interested in this, you could catch Adriana and a whole bunch of other smart folks tomorrow in London in a special extension of the Social Media Cafe.

Share Post

More Posts

Blogging for Ourhouse

Welcome to the Ourhouse Weblog. Blogging is something I’ve become increasingly interested in. Earlier this month I set up the Beyond Branding Blog which is

Collaboration

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking – and worrying – about collaboration. I think the ability to collaborate effectively is becoming ever more essential

Just Undo It?

The AntiBrand: blackSpot sneakers, a project by Adbusters attacks Nike directly. In doing so they take on what has become one of the great icons

Trust and NGOs

My friend Olaf Brugman has invited me to take part in a workshop in Brussels on October 29th. It looks set to be an interesting

SharpReader

I’ve finally started paying attention to RSS and all this stuff about “Blog Aggregators”. The final shove was wanting to get Martin Roell’s English feed.

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Simple ideas, lightly held

A few years back I contributed a chapter to the More Space project. I had a look at it again recently and thought it still stood up pretty well. Here’s

Johnnie Moore

Panels, Q & As etc

John Dodds has done a post – 10 Marketing Lessons From Conferences – with some tips on how to avoid your next conference being boring. Lots of interesting ideas if

Johnnie Moore

Structure and freedom

Dave Snowden has good post about putting tools in their place. The essence of his argument is this: If you pick up a tool and it fits your hand its