Johnnie Moore

Honesty in market research

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I just swapped emails with Tony Hufflett of The Fat Group. They’re trying to shake up the dull old world of market research; it certainly needs shaking up.

I thought this was an interesting point they make on their site about the honesty of responses to surveys.

There is room for respondent dishonesty in any questioning environment. The level of dishonesty grows with the increase in boredom or disengagment.

Our experience tells us that dishonesty (in any environment) occurs when the questioner either bores the respondent or the tone is wrong. This is even more true on the net when respondents are not having to act in an acceptable manner before another person (in a face-to-face encounter or over the phone (which creates its own artificiality)) instead they are able to be truly themselves and show how they feel straight away.

So the key to on-line honesty is to be creative, make it fun and don’t ask too many questions. If you still doubt on-line honesty you have only to look at the recent U.S and U.K elections. In both instances the web research came closest to the actual result. The reason: people couldn’t articulate face-to-face or over a phone something they felt the questioner might find unacceptable (such as under 35 and voting Tory in the last election) but would be honest about with their impersonal screen and in the voting booth.

When I do surveys, I recognise the point where boredom kicks in and I stop trying to articulate my real views and start rushing to get to the end.

Share Post

More Posts

Focus group flaws

Tony‘s been writing of his first time experiences of focus groups – two in one week. He comments: I attended my first ever advertising focus

Cheap and simple research

I used to do a lot more market research for people. These days I’m doing it less often. I think it’s because I’ve become disillusioned

Blogging at tipping point?

Jennifer Rice first pointed to these stats on blogging a few days ago. Jennifer and I were chatting about them on the phone yesterday, and

Opining for Money

Last night I was paid to take part in a panel of experts (who me?) to give feedback to a financial brand about the trends

The flaws of focus groups

A good article from the Market Research industry trade mag highlights some of the pitfalls of focus groups – how sometimes they reduce the sense of connection with the customer.

Survey fatigue

I’ve just completed a survey handed to me at Euston station the other day. It’s one of those standard multiple choice jobbies. Don’t ask me

The tyranny of the explicit in marketing

I’m continuing to have thoughts in response to reading Herd probably because Mark Earls’ position so often reverberates with mine. There’s nothing like having one’s

The “I love data” guy

Oh another nice moment from the IMC conference was running into Bill Tancer. Bill was on a panel I moderated and introduced himself as someone

MRS conference

James and I put in an appearance at the Market Research Society Conference in London yesterday. We gave a short talk about Blogging and listened

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Momentum or strategy?

Eaon Pritchard really got me thinking with his post on momentum and strategy. He gives a good example from US politics and cites Mark Earls‘ line: wouldn’t it be useful

Johnnie Moore

De-coded

Tim O’Reilly’s proposal for a bloggers code of conduct is looking increasingly forlorn. Over at gapingvoid Kathy Sierra rejects it. And Tristan Louis gives it a well-deserved fisking (hat tip:

Johnnie Moore

links for 2011-05-31

Innovation Lessons from the Startup Genome Report « Innovation Leadership Network The wiilingness to pivot (but not too often) and a sense of purpose – not just making money –

Johnnie Moore

Witless contributors…

Neil McIntosh of Guardian Unlimited does a terrific fisking of the National Union of Journalists’ code of conduct for using “witness contributors”. That by the way, is their euphemism for