Johnnie Moore

Intangibles?

Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

I had an interesting conversation last week about intangibles. I think this word gets used in strange ways.

When businesses talk about “intangibles” it seems to me they mean things that can’t really be measured but can be felt. Yet they then attempt to measure them and use this word – intangible – to describe them as if they literally can’t be felt.

Which is odd. Mention a person or brand to me with a strong identity and I will have a strong felt reaction. So will most people. We might put some rational words to that reaction but there will be a feeling at the core of it. The feeling may be disgust delight excitement… and it will almost certainly have a physical response that goes with it, a gut feel.

It seems to me that if we can’t value – in the minimal sense of actually paying attention to – the felt reactions in our own bodies… we’re missing something pretty vital. And as my friend Mark Brady points out, no-one threw themselves on a hand grenade for a spreadsheet.

This is a can of worms I know, but I felt like opening it.

Share Post

More Posts

Fluke

There’s more potential in each moment than we realise

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

The perils of efficiency

When I’m talking about facilitation, I often find myself saying that the effort to be efficient is what makes meetings inefficient. By setting agendas which assume that groups of people

Johnnie Moore

Organising round passion

I had lunch yesterday with Euan Semple Alex Kjerulf and Lars Plougmann. The world was generally put to rights and I got to see how many books Alex buys each

Johnnie Moore

Selling paper

More pith from Paul Graham: We can all imagine an old-style editor getting a scoop and saying “this will sell a lot of papers!” Cross out that final S and

Johnnie Moore

Simplexity…

Ken Thompson points to this LA Times article by Jeffrey Kluger about simplexity – how apparently inconsequential things can have major effects in systems. I’m not one for jargon, but