“Reinforcing” brands

On some promotional blurb I heard about yesterday: the suggestion that companies can use blogs to “reinforce brands”.

I ignored it at the time but it stuck in my mind.

I think that blogs are better used to soften brands. To move away from shouting at people and towards conversation. From saying “this is who we are and this is our big idea” towards “what do you think of this?”.

Reinforcing also seems to belong to a worldview that treats brands as solid things, to be controlled. Just like “brand building” and “brand architecture”. I think it’s more interesting to see them as organic, to be influenced.

[AFTERTHOUGHT]Maybe even talk of “softening” a brand is the same mistake in new clothes. More on this later.

[UPDATE]As I say in below in response to Aleah, I think using blogs in a calculated to change the brand sounds like barking up the wrong tree.

3 thoughts on ““Reinforcing” brands

  1. Aleah

    I sort of look at blogging as the brand’s angry, disenfranchised little brother. If there is an angle to incorporate or “soften” as you say, then the blog just becomes another billboard. I think that’s the problem with companies that ask employees to blog, yet subtly silence them from speaking their truth – it just becomes another crappy campaign.

    Reply
  2. Johnnie Moore

    Aleah: Yes, my afterthought heads into this territory. And touches on Hugh’s argument too. Branding is almost a byword for contrivance, an attempt to control. Blogging isn’t good for that.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.