Johnnie Moore

The B Word

An attempt to see how different meanings for the word Brand lead to mischief and hurt feelings.
Johnnie Moore

Johnnie Moore

I’m Johnnie Moore, and I help people work better together

It seems to me a lot of confusion and irritation about branding and whether it’s good or not, arises from different meanings people attribute to the word. (Christine Arden of allaboutbranding and DNA Design in Auckland made this point to me last week and inspired me to write this.)

I don’t want to bore you with linguistic deckchairs, though that may be the effect of this post. And I’d like to avoid telling you which definition is right, because it’s hardly my place to do so.

First, there was Brand as trademark, and that was simple enough.

Then the marketing boys got excited and started to create bigger ideas of what a brand was through things like advertising, design etc. Hence brand-as-idealised-image. Not to be confused with what we consumers laughingly call reality.

This was most prominent in the commercial world, which means that for many people, brand-as-image became synonymous with brand-as-giant-con-trick perpetrated by unscrupulous manipulators. These people, understandably, get irate when anyone talks about Oxfam or the Catholic Church as a brand.

Although a fourth definition of brand would include all such organisations. This, the broadest definition, is brand-as-shorthand-for-ideas people have about people, organisations or things.

Where there is a lot of mischief is when people slip artfully from one definition to another. Thus they start with the broad definition and pay tribute to how consumers now control brands. Then proceed to talk about the branding-as-ideal work they do as if it controls the whole thing.

Personally, I favour the broadest definition but also still feel a bit uneasy talking about worthy causes as brands, simply because the word still carries the baggage from the more crass commercial attempts at branding.

Is this helpful or are you bored yet?

Share Post

More Posts

Waterfalls and chaos

I linked to this paper on wicked problems the other day and Chris Corrigan commented “there’s a lot in that paper eh?”. Which is true.

Passion branding

Passion brands bring people together based on common interests and excitements. I’m particularly interested in ones created from the bottom up, as opposed to driven by producers concerned mainly with profit.

Medinge Moments

Just back from another extraordinary gathering at Medinge where the community that has produced Beyond Branding meets each summer. I was planning to keep this

The volatile chemistry of trust

Interesting research from Stanford suggests that exciting brands get more trusted after making mistakes and putting them right whilst more “sincere” brands start with more trust but lose it more easily. Perhaps the sensible interpretation is that second-guessing customers can be a waste of time!

What brand are you?

Thanks to Matt Tucker at Smith Associates for telling me about What Brand Are You. It strikes me that lots of companies waste money on

Just Undo It?

The AntiBrand: blackSpot sneakers, a project by Adbusters attacks Nike directly. In doing so they take on what has become one of the great icons

Putting humanity into branding

We live in a world of too much marketing and too much branding. People’s faith in advertising has fallen to new lows as we simply

New Abbey

So the Abbey National is rebranding itself this morning. As I write this entry, they are revealing their new look, their shortened name (just “Abbey”)

More Updates

Emotional debt

Releasing the hidden costs of pent up frustrations

Aliveness

Finding the aliveness below the surface of stuck

Johnnie Moore

Cheesemakers…

So in the next reflections video I talk a bit more about the wisdom of Monty Python when working with organisations… And here are the two clips I refer to.

Johnnie Moore

Our Social World

I’m taking part in Our Social World on Friday September 9th in Cambridge. There’s an interesting collection of speakers and topics including Hugh who argues “marketeers are going to have